Systems, methods and apparatus for digital-to-analog conversion of superconducting magnetic flux signals

ABSTRACT

A superconducting flux digital-to-analog converter includes a superconducting inductor ladder circuit. The ladder circuit includes a plurality of closed superconducting current paths that each includes at least two superconducting inductors coupled in series to form a respective superconducting loop, successively adjacent or neighboring superconducting loops are connected in parallel with each other and share at least one of the superconducting inductors to form a flux divider network. A data signal input structure provides a respective bit of a multiple bit signal to each of the superconducting loops. The data signal input structure may include a set of superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs). The data signal input structure may include a superconducting shift register, for example a single-flux quantum (SFQ) shift register or a flux-based superconducting shift register comprising a number of latching qubits.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a division of U.S. patent application Ser. No.12/120,354, filed May 14, 2008, now pending, which claims benefit under35 U.S.C. 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No.60/917,884, filed May 14, 2007, entitled “Scalable Superconducting FluxDigital-To-Analog Conversion Using A Superconducting Inductor LadderCircuit”, U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/917,891, filedMay 14, 2007, entitled “Systems, Methods, And Apparatus For A ScalableSuperconducting Flux Digital-To-Analog Converter”, and U.S. ProvisionalPatent Application Ser. No. 60/975,487, filed Sep. 26, 2007, entitled“Systems, Methods and Apparatus for a Differential Superconducting FluxDigital-to-Analog Converter”, which are incorporated herein by referencein their entirety.

BACKGROUND

1. Field

The present systems, methods, and apparatus generally relate tosuperconducting circuits and digital-to-analog conversion ofsuperconducting signals, and particularly relate to scalable quantumcomputing and the programming of elements of a superconducting quantumprocessor.

2. Description of the Related Art

A Turing machine is a theoretical computing system, described in 1936 byAlan Turing. A Turing machine that can efficiently simulate any otherTuring machine is called a Universal Turing Machine (UTM). TheChurch-Turing thesis states that any practical computing model haseither the equivalent or a subset of the capabilities of a UTM.

A quantum computer is any physical system that harnesses one or morequantum effects to perform a computation. A quantum computer that canefficiently simulate any other quantum computer is called a UniversalQuantum Computer (UQC).

In 1981 Richard P. Feynman proposed that quantum computers could be usedto solve certain computational problems more efficiently than a UTM andtherefore invalidate the Church-Turing thesis. See e.g., Feynman R. P.,“Simulating Physics with Computers”, International Journal ofTheoretical Physics, Vol. 21 (1982) pp. 467-488. For example, Feynmannoted that a quantum computer could be used to simulate certain otherquantum systems, allowing exponentially faster calculation of certainproperties of the simulated quantum system than is possible using a UTM.

Approaches to Quantum Computation

There are several general approaches to the design and operation ofquantum computers. One such approach is the “circuit model” of quantumcomputation. In this approach, qubits are acted upon by sequences oflogical gates that are the compiled representation of an algorithm.Circuit model quantum computers have several serious barriers topractical implementation. In the circuit model, it is required thatqubits remain coherent over time periods much longer than thesingle-gate time. This requirement arises because circuit model quantumcomputers require operations that are collectively called quantum errorcorrection in order to operate. Quantum error correction cannot beperformed without the circuit model quantum computer's qubits beingcapable of maintaining quantum coherence over time periods on the orderof 1,000 times the single-gate time. Much research has been focused ondeveloping qubits with coherence sufficient to form the basicinformation units of circuit model quantum computers. See e.g., Shor, P.W. “Introduction to Quantum Algorithms”, arXiv.org:quant-ph/0005003(2001), pp. 1-27. The art is still hampered by an inability to increasethe coherence of qubits to acceptable levels for designing and operatingpractical circuit model quantum computers.

Another approach to quantum computation involves using the naturalphysical evolution of a system of coupled quantum systems as acomputational system. This approach does not make critical use ofquantum gates and circuits. Instead, starting from a known initialHamiltonian, it relies upon the guided physical evolution of a system ofcoupled quantum systems wherein the problem to be solved has beenencoded in the terms of the system's Hamiltonian, so that the finalstate of the system of coupled quantum systems contains informationrelating to the answer to the problem to be solved. This approach doesnot require long qubit coherence times. Examples of this type ofapproach include adiabatic quantum computation, cluster-state quantumcomputation, one-way quantum computation, quantum annealing andclassical annealing, and are described, for example, in Farhi, E. etal., “Quantum Adiabatic Evolution Algorithms versus Simulated Annealing”arXiv.org:quant-ph/0201031 (2002), pp 1-16.

Qubits

As mentioned previously, qubits can be used as fundamental units ofinformation for a quantum computer. As with bits in UTMs, qubits canrefer to at least two distinct quantities; a qubit can refer to theactual physical device in which information is stored, and it can alsorefer to the unit of information itself, abstracted away from itsphysical device. Examples of qubits include quantum particles, atoms,electrons, photons, ions, and the like.

Qubits generalize the concept of a classical digital bit. A classicalinformation storage device can encode two discrete states, typicallylabeled “0” and “1”. Physically these two discrete states arerepresented by two different and distinguishable physical states of theclassical information storage device, such as direction or magnitude ofmagnetic field, current, or voltage, where the quantity encoding the bitstate behaves according to the laws of classical physics. A qubit alsocontains two discrete physical states, which can also be labeled “0” and“1”. Physically these two discrete states are represented by twodifferent and distinguishable physical states of the quantum informationstorage device, such as direction or magnitude of magnetic field,current, or voltage, where the quantity encoding the bit state behavesaccording to the laws of quantum physics. If the physical quantity thatstores these states behaves quantum mechanically, the device canadditionally be placed in a superposition of 0 and 1. That is, the qubitcan exist in both a “0” and “1” state at the same time, and so canperform a computation on both states simultaneously. In general, Nqubits can be in a superposition of 2^(N) states. Quantum algorithmsmake use of the superposition property to speed up some computations.

In standard notation, the basis states of a qubit are referred to as the|0

and |1

states. During quantum computation, the state of a qubit, in general, isa superposition of basis states so that the qubit has a nonzeroprobability of occupying the |0

basis state and a simultaneous nonzero probability of occupying the |1

basis state. Mathematically, a superposition of basis states means thatthe overall state of the qubit, which is denoted |Ψ

, has the form |Ψ

=α|0

+b|1

, where a and b are coefficients corresponding to the probabilities |a|²and |b|², respectively. The coefficients a and b each have real andimaginary components, which allows the phase of the qubit to becharacterized. The quantum nature of a qubit is largely derived from itsability to exist in a coherent superposition of basis states and for thestate of the qubit to have a phase. A qubit will retain this ability toexist as a coherent superposition of basis states when the qubit issufficiently isolated from sources of decoherence.

To complete a computation using a qubit, the state of the qubit ismeasured (i.e., read out). Typically, when a measurement of the qubit isperformed, the quantum nature of the qubit is temporarily lost and thesuperposition of basis states collapses to either the |0

basis state or the |1

basis state and thus regaining its similarity to a conventional bit. Theactual state of the qubit after it has collapsed depends on theprobabilities |a|² and |b|² immediately prior to the readout operation.

Superconducting Qubits

There are many different hardware and software approaches underconsideration for use in quantum computers. One hardware approach usesintegrated circuits formed of superconducting materials, such asaluminum or niobium. The technologies and processes involved indesigning and fabricating superconducting integrated circuits aresimilar in some respects to those used for conventional integratedcircuits.

Superconducting qubits are a type of superconducting device that can beincluded in a superconducting integrated circuit. Typicalsuperconducting qubits, for example, have the advantage of scalabilityand are generally classified depending on the physical properties usedto encode information including, for example, charge and phase devices,phase or flux devices, hybrid devices, and the like. Superconductingqubits can be separated into several categories depending on thephysical property used to encode information. For example, they may beseparated into charge, flux and phase devices, as discussed in, forexample Makhlin et al., 2001, Reviews of Modern Physics 73, pp. 357-400.Charge devices store and manipulate information in the charge states ofthe device, where elementary charges consist of pairs of electronscalled Cooper pairs. A Cooper pair has a charge of 2e and consists oftwo electrons bound together by, for example, a phonon interaction. Seee.g., Nielsen and Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information,Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000), pp. 343-345. Flux devicesstore information in a variable related to the magnetic flux throughsome part of the device. Phase devices store information in a variablerelated to the difference in superconducting phase between two regionsof the phase device. Recently, hybrid devices using two or more ofcharge, flux and phase degrees of freedom have been developed. See e.g.,U.S. Pat. No. 6,838,694 and U.S. Pat. No. 7,335,909.

Examples of flux qubits that may be used include rf-SQUIDs, whichinclude a superconducting loop interrupted by one Josephson junction, ora compound junction (where a single Josephson junction is replaced bytwo parallel Josephson junctions), or persistent current qubits, whichinclude a superconducting loop interrupted by three Josephson junctions,and the like. See e.g., Mooij et al., 1999, Science 285, 1036; andOrlando et al., 1999, Phys. Rev. B 60, 15398. Other examples ofsuperconducting qubits can be found, for example, in Il'ichev et al.,2003, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 097906; Blatter et al., 2001, Phys. Rev. B63, 174511, and Friedman et al., 2000, Nature 406, 43. In addition,hybrid charge-phase qubits may also be used.

The qubits may include a corresponding local bias device. The local biasdevices may include a metal loop in proximity to a superconducting qubitthat provides an external flux bias to the qubit. The local bias devicemay also include a plurality of Josephson junctions. Eachsuperconducting qubit in the quantum processor may have a correspondinglocal bias device or there may be fewer local bias devices than qubits.In some embodiments, charge-based readout and local bias devices may beused. The readout device(s) may include a plurality of dc-SQUIDmagnetometers, each inductively connected to a different qubit within atopology. The readout device may provide a voltage or current. Thedc-SQUID magnetometers including a loop of superconducting materialinterrupted by at least one Josephson junction are well known in theart.

Quantum Processor

A computer processor may take the form of an analog processor, forinstance a quantum processor such as a superconducting quantumprocessor. A superconducting quantum processor may include a number ofqubits and associated local bias devices, for instance two or moresuperconducting qubits. Further detail and embodiments of exemplaryquantum processors that may be used in conjunction with the presentsystems, methods, and apparatus are described in US Patent PublicationNo. 2006-0225165, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/013,192, U.S.Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/986,554 filed Nov. 8, 2007and entitled “Systems, Devices and Methods for Analog Processing,” andU.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/039,710, filed Mar. 26,2008 and entitled “Systems, Devices, And Methods For Analog Processing.”

A superconducting quantum processor may include a number of couplingdevices operable to selectively couple respective pairs of qubits.Examples of superconducting coupling devices include rf-SQUIDs anddc-SQUIDs, which couple qubits together by flux. SQUIDs include asuperconducting loop interrupted by one Josephson junction (an rf-SQUID)or two Josephson junctions (a dc-SQUID). The coupling devices may becapable of both ferromagnetic and anti-ferromagnetic coupling, dependingon how the coupling device is being utilized within the interconnectedtopology. In the case of flux coupling, ferromagnetic coupling impliesthat parallel fluxes are energetically favorable and anti-ferromagneticcoupling implies that anti-parallel fluxes are energetically favorable.Alternatively, charge-based coupling devices may also be used. Othercoupling devices can be found, for example, in US Patent Publication No.2006-0147154 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/017,995. Respectivecoupling strengths of the coupling devices may be tuned between zero anda maximum value, for example, to provide ferromagnetic oranti-ferromagnetic coupling between qubits.

Regardless of the specific hardware being implemented, managing a singlequbit requires control over a number of parameters. Conventionally, thisrequirement necessitated outside communication (that is, communicationfrom outside of the processor architecture) with individual qubits.However, since overall processing power increases with the number ofqubits in the system, high capacity processors that exceed the abilitiesof conventional supercomputers must manage a large number of qubits andthus the conventional approach of employing outside control overmultiple parameters on individual qubits requires a complicated systemfor programming qubit parameters.

Thus, the scalability of quantum processors is limited by the complexityof the qubit parameter control system and there remains a need in theart for a scalable qubit parameter control system.

Superconducting Processor

A computer processor may take the form of a superconducting processor,where the superconducting processor may not be a quantum processor inthe traditional sense. For instance, some embodiments of asuperconducting processor may not focus on quantum effects such asquantum tunneling, superposition, and entanglement but may ratheroperate by emphasizing different principles, such as for example theprinciples that govern the operation of classical computer processors.However, there may still be certain advantages to the implementation ofsuch superconducting processors. Due to their natural physicalproperties, superconducting processors in general may be capable ofhigher switching speeds and shorter computation times thannon-superconducting processors, and therefore it may be more practicalto solve certain problems on superconducting processors.

BRIEF SUMMARY

One aspect may be summarized as a superconducting inductor laddercircuit that includes a first closed superconducting current path thatincludes at least two superconducting inductors coupled in series witheach other along the first closed superconducting current path to form afirst superconducting loop; at least a second closed superconductingcurrent path that includes at least two superconducting inductorscoupled in series with each other along the second closedsuperconducting current path to form a second superconducting loop,wherein the first and the second superconducting loops are connected inparallel with each other such that there is a portion of the first andthe second closed superconducting current paths that includes at leastone of the superconducting inductors that is shared by the first and thesecond superconducting loops, and at least one of the superconductinginductors of the first superconducting loop is not shared with thesecond superconducting loop and at least one of the superconductinginductors of the second superconducting loop is not shared with thefirst superconducting loop; a data signal input structure configured tocouple data signals to at least one of the unshared superconductinginductors in each of at least the first and the second superconductingloops; and a data signal output structure configured to couple datasignals from at least one of the first and second superconducting loops.The data signal input structure may include at least two superconductinginductors, each positioned sufficiently proximate at least one of theunshared superconducting inductors in a respective one of thesuperconducting loops to inductively couple the data signals thereto.The data signal input structure may be configured to administer a signalwith a resolution of at least two bits such that a first signal bit isloaded into the first superconducting loop and a second signal bit isloaded into the second superconducting loop. The superconductinginductor ladder circuit may include at least one additional closedsuperconducting current path that includes at least two superconductinginductors coupled in series with each other along the third closedsuperconducting current paths to form additional superconducting loopsconnected in parallel with one another such that successive ones of theadditional superconducting loops share at least one of thesuperconducting inductors with an immediately preceding one of theadditional superconducting loops, and wherein the data signal inputstructure is further configured to couple data signals to at least onesuperconducting inductor of each of the additional superconductingloops. The data signal input structure may include a superconductingshift register, for example a single-flux quantum (SFQ) shift registeror a flux-based superconducting shift register comprising latchingqubits.

Another aspect may be summarized as a method of performingdigital-to-analog conversion of a superconducting signal that includesestablishing a digital signal represented by magnetic flux quanta;loading a number of individual bits of the digital signal intorespective ones of a number of superconducting loops of asuperconducting inductor ladder circuit; and allowing the individualbits of the digital signal to combine into one combined analog signalwithin the superconducting inductor ladder circuit according to a ratioof the magnitudes of a number of shared superconducting inductors and anumber of unshared superconducting inductors. Loading a number ofindividual bits of the digital signal into respective ones of a numberof superconducting loops of a superconducting inductor ladder circuitmay include loading the individual bits of the digital signal into thesuperconducting inductor ladder circuit from individual signal linesthat are inductively coupled to the respective ones of thesuperconducting loops of the superconducting inductor ladder circuit.Loading a number of individual bits of the digital signal intorespective ones of a number of superconducting loops of asuperconducting inductor ladder circuit may include loading theindividual bits of the digital signal into the superconducting inductorladder circuit from a superconducting shift register, for example, asingle-flux quantum (SFQ) shift register or a flux-based superconductingshift register comprising latching qubits.

Another aspect may be summarized as a superconductive inductor laddercircuit that includes a plurality of input devices superconductivelycoupled in series with each other; an output device; and asuperconductive inductor flux divider network superconductively coupledto provide a successively attenuated flux signal to the output devicefrom each of the input devices in relation to a relative proximity ofthe respective input device to the output device with respect to theother ones of the input devices. The plurality of input devicessuperconductively coupled in series with each other may include a numberN of input devices and wherein the superconductive inductor flux dividernetwork includes a number N−1 of superconductive inductors, each of theN−1 superconductive inductors having a first node and a second node, thefirst node of each of the N−1 superconductive inductors coupled betweena respective pair of the N input devices and a second node of the N−1superconductive inductors commonly coupled to each other such that theN−1 superconductive inductors are superconductively coupled in parallelwith each other. The superconductive inductor flux divider network mayfurther include a last superconductive inductor having a first node anda second node, the first node of the last superconductive inductorcoupled in series to the first node of one of the N−1 superconductiveinductors and the second node of the last superconductive inductorcommonly coupled to the second node of each of the N−1 superconductiveinductors such that the last superconductive inductor issuperconductively coupled in parallel with each of the N−1superconductive inductors. The output device may be a superconductiveinductor, superconductively coupled in parallel with the N−1superconductive inductors and with the last superconductive inductor.The input devices may each be a respective superconductive inductor. Aratio of inductance between the N−1 superconductive inductors and theinput devices may be approximately 2:1.

One aspect may be summarized as a superconducting flux digital-to-analogconverter (DAC) that includes N superconducting quantum interferencedevices (SQUIDs), each of the N SQUIDs including at least one Josephsonjunction, wherein N is a positive integer; N superconducting inductors,each of the N superconducting inductors superconductingly coupled inparallel with the at least one Josephson junction of a respective one ofthe SQUIDs, and each of the N superconducting inductorssuperconductingly coupled in parallel with one another; a gate currentline that superconductingly connects each of the N SQUIDs in series withone another; a data signal input structure configured to load at leastone digital bit of information into a respective one of each of the NSQUIDs; and a data signal output structure configured to couple at leastone analog signal to at least one programmable device.

Another aspect may be summarized as a superconducting fluxdigital-to-analog converter (DAC) that includes a sets of Nsuperconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs) wherein each SQUIDincludes at least one Josephson junction, and wherein a and N are bothpositive integers; a sets of N superconducting inductors wherein eachsuperconducting inductor is superconductingly coupled in parallel withthe at least one Josephson junction of a respective one of the SQUIDs,and wherein each of the N superconducting inductors in respective onesof the a sets of N superconducting inductors are superconductinglycoupled in parallel with one another; a gate current line thatsuperconductingly connects each of the N SQUIDs in series with oneanother; a data signal input structure configured to load at least onedigital bit of information into a respective one of each of the NSQUIDs; and a data signal output structure configured to couple at leastone analog signal to at least one programmable device.

In either aspect, a and/or N may be greater than one. In either aspect,the SQUIDs may be arranged in an a by N array to form an arrayalweighted superconducting flux DAC, and the a sets of N parallel-coupledsuperconducting inductors form a respective set of a parallel networksof superconducting loops in which the inductances of the superconductinginductors are selected such that flux quanta administered to eachparallel network of superconducting loops are combined in weightedmeasures within each parallel network of superconducting loops accordingto the respective SQUID from whence each flux quantum originated, andwherein the weighting depends on a ratio k_(x) of the inductances ofsuccessively adjacent superconducting inductors in each parallel networkof superconducting loops. The at least one programmable device may be anelement of a superconducting quantum processor. The data signal outputstructure may include at least one superconducting inductor that employsat least one of inductive coupling, capacitive coupling, or galvaniccoupling. The data signal output structure may include intermediatecoupling devices, which may be activated and deactivated via couplingcontrol signal lines. In some embodiments two or more intermediatecoupling devices may be controlled via a same control signal line. Thedata signal input structure may include N control current signal lines,at least one control current signal line is inductively coupled to arespective one of the N SQUIDs. The data signal input structure mayinclude N control current signal lines, at least one control currentsignal line is inductively coupled to a respective one of the N SQUIDsin each of the a sets of N SQUIDs such that at least a SQUIDs areinductively coupled to each one of the N control current signal lines.The data signal input structure may include at least one superconductingshift register and data signals are loaded from the at least onesuperconducting shift register to each SQUID by inductive coupling. Theat least one superconducting shift register may be a single flux quantum(SFQ) shift register or a flux-based superconducting shift registercomprised of latching qubits. The data signal input structure isconfigured to load at least one N-bit digital signal into thesuperconducting flux DAC such that respective ones of each of the N bitsare each loaded into a respective SQUID.

In either aspect, the inductance and critical current of each SQUID ismay be selected such that each SQUID is capable of managing a number nof magnetic flux quanta according to the relationship

${n = \frac{{LI}_{c}}{\Phi_{o}}},$where L is the SQUID inductance, I_(c) is the Josephson junctioncritical current, φ₀ is the magnetic flux quantum and n≧1. A maximumsignal resolution may be administered by selecting the inductances ofthe superconducting inductors such that each unique digital input signalcorresponds to a unique analog output signal. The inductances ofsuccessively adjacent superconducting inductors within a parallelnetwork of superconducting loops may be such that less than one fullflux quantum is always transferred to an adjacent superconductinginductor. The ratio of the inductances, k_(x), between successivelyadjacent superconducting inductors in a parallel network ofsuperconducting loops may be

$k_{x} < \frac{\Phi_{o}}{{LI}_{c}}$where L is the SQUID inductance, I_(c) is the Josephson junctioncritical current, and φ₀ is the magnetic flux quantum.

Yet another aspect may be summarized as a method of programming theelements of a superconducting programmable device including encoding theprogramming of the desired elements in at least one N-bit digitalsignal; physically realizing the digital signal in the form of discretemagnetic flux quanta; administering the discrete magnetic flux quanta toparallel storage devices; combining the discrete magnetic flux quantainto a calibrated analog signal, wherein the contribution of eachmagnetic flux quantum is weighted according to the parallel storagedevice from whence it originated; and administering the calibratedanalog signal to a programmable element of the superconductingprogrammable device.

At least one embodiment may be summarized as a superconducting fluxdigital-to-analog converter (DAC) including a number of Nsuperconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs), each of the NSQUIDs respectively including at least a first Josephson junction and asecond Josephson junction, wherein N is a positive integer; a first setof N superconducting transformers, each of the superconductingtransformers in the first set of N superconducting transformerscomprises at least a first superconducting inductor and secondsuperconducting inductor positioned sufficiently proximate one anotherto couple signals therebetween, and wherein the first superconductinginductor in a respective one of each of the first set of Nsuperconducting transformers is superconductingly coupled in parallelwith the first Josephson junction in a respective SQUID; a second set ofN superconducting transformers, each of the superconducting transformersin the second set of N superconducting transformers comprising at leasta first superconducting inductor and a second superconducting inductorpositioned sufficiently proximate one another to couple signalstherebetween, wherein the first superconducting inductor in a respectiveone of each of the second set of N superconducting transformers issuperconductingly coupled in parallel with the second Josephson junctionin a respective SQUID; a first superconducting inductor ladder circuitformed by a first set of N closed superconducting current paths, whereineach respective closed superconducting current path in the firstsuperconducting inductor ladder circuit includes at least twosuperconducting inductors coupled in series with each other along therespective closed superconducting current path, and wherein one of theat least two superconducting inductors in each of the first set of Nclosed superconducting current paths is the second superconductinginductor from a respective one of the superconducting transformers inthe first set of N superconducting transformers, and wherein the firstset of N closed superconducting current paths are connected in parallelwith one another such that each pair of successive closedsuperconducting current paths in the first superconducting inductorladder circuit shares at least one superconducting inductor; a secondsuperconducting inductor ladder circuit formed by a second set of Nclosed superconducting current paths, wherein each respective closedsuperconducting current path in the second superconducting inductorladder circuit includes at least two superconducting inductors coupledin series with each other along the respective closed superconductingcurrent path, and wherein one of the at least two superconductinginductors in each of the second set of N closed superconducting currentpaths is the second superconducting inductor from a respective one ofthe superconducting transformers in the second set of N superconductingtransformers, and wherein the second set of N closed superconductingcurrent paths are connected in parallel with one another such that eachpair of successive closed superconducting current paths in the secondsuperconducting inductor ladder circuit shares at least onesuperconducting inductor; a column current line that superconductinglyconnects each of the N SQUIDs in series with one another; a first datasignal input structure configured to load at least one digital bit ofinformation into a respective one of each of the N SQUIDs; and a datasignal output structure configured to couple at least one analog signalto at least one programmable device.

The data signal output structure may include a gradiometric transformerthat is inductively coupled to at least one of the superconductinginductors in both the first and the second superconducting inductorladder circuits. The superconducting flux DAC may further include asecond data signal input structure configured to load at least onedigital bit of information into each of the N SQUIDs. The first datasignal input structure may include N signal lines, each of the N SQUIDscoupled to a respective one of the N signal lines of the first datasignal input structure, and the second data signal input structure mayinclude a signal line, all of the N SQUIDs coupled to the signal line ofthe second data signal input structure.

At least one embodiment may be summarized as a superconducting fluxdigital-to-analog conversion system including a number a ofsuperconducting flux DACs, wherein each superconducting flux DACcomprises: a number N of superconducting quantum interference devices(SQUIDs), each of the SQUIDs including at least a first Josephsonjunction and a second Josephson junction, wherein N is a positiveinteger; a first set of N superconducting transformers, each of thesuperconducting transformers in the first set of superconductingtransformers comprises at least a first superconducting inductor and asecond superconducting inductor positioned sufficiently proximate oneanother to couple signals therebetween, and wherein the firstsuperconducting inductor in a respective one of each of the first set ofN superconducting transformers is superconductingly coupled in parallelwith the first Josephson junction in a respective one of the SQUIDs; asecond set of N superconducting transformers, each of thesuperconducting transformers in the second set of superconductingtransformers comprising at least a first superconducting inductor and asecond superconducting inductor positioned sufficiently proximate oneanother to couple signals therebetween, wherein the firstsuperconducting inductor in a respective one of each of the second Nsuperconducting transformers is superconductingly coupled in parallelwith the second Josephson junction in a respective one of the SQUIDs; afirst superconducting inductor ladder circuit formed by a first set of Nclosed superconducting current paths, wherein each respective closedsuperconducting current path in the first superconducting inductorladder circuit includes at least two superconducting inductors coupledin series with each other along the respective closed superconductingcurrent path, and wherein one of the at least two superconductinginductors in each of the first set of N closed superconducting currentpaths is the second superconducting inductor from a respectivesuperconducting transformer in the first set of N superconductingtransformers, and wherein the first set of N closed superconductingcurrent paths are connected in parallel with one another such that eachpair of successive closed superconducting current paths shares at leastone superconducting inductor; a second superconducting inductor laddercircuit formed by a second set of N closed superconducting currentpaths, wherein each respective closed superconducting current path inthe second superconducting inductor ladder circuit includes at least twosuperconducting inductors coupled in series with each other along therespective closed superconducting current path, and wherein one of theat least two superconducting inductors in each of the second set of Nclosed superconducting current paths is the second superconductinginductor from a respective superconducting transformer in the second setof N superconducting transformers, and wherein the second set of Nclosed superconducting current paths are connected in parallel with oneanother such that each pair of successive closed superconducting currentpaths shares at least one superconducting inductor; a first columncurrent line that superconductingly connects each of the N SQUIDs inseries with one another; a first set of data signal input lines eachconfigured to load at least one digital bit of information into arespective one of each of the N SQUIDs; a second set of data signalinput lines configured to load at least one digital bit of informationinto each of the N SQUIDs; and a data signal output structure configuredto couple at least one analog signal to at least one programmabledevice, wherein respective ones of at least some of the SQUIDS from eachof the DACs that occupy a same position in the respective DAC relativeto the other SQUIDS in the respective DAC are coupled to receive the atleast one digital bit of information via a same one of the data signalinput lines of the first set of data signal input lines, and wherein foreach of the DACs at least two of the SQUIDS in the respective DAC arecoupled to receive the at least one digital bit of information via asame one of the data signal input lines of the second set of data signalinput lines.

At least one of the N SQUIDs in respective ones of at least two of the asuperconducting flux DACs may be coupled to receive the at least onedigital bit of information via a same one of the data signal input linesof the second set of data signal input lines. At least one of the NSQUIDs in respective ones of at least two of the a superconducting fluxDACs may be coupled to be at least partially controlled via the firstcolumn current line. Each data signal output structure may include agradiometric transformer that is inductively coupled to at least one ofthe superconducting inductors in both the first and the secondsuperconducting inductor ladder circuits. The at least one programmabledevice may be an element of a superconducting processor. Thesuperconducting processor may be a superconducting quantum processor.The data signal output structure may include at least one intermediatecoupling device. The at least one intermediate coupling device may beinductively coupled to both a programmable device and a superconductinginductor in the data signal output structure, and wherein the at leastone intermediate coupling device may be activated and deactivated via acoupling control signal line. At least two of the intermediate couplingdevices may be connected to and controlled by the same coupling controlsignal line. The values α and N may each be greater than one.

At least one embodiment may be summarized as an array addressablesuperconducting flux digital-to-analog converter (DAC) structureincluding a first plurality of DACs addressable by a first column line,each of the DACs in the first plurality of DACs addressable by arespective one of a number of row lines; and at least a second pluralityof DACs addressable by a second column line, each of the DACs in thesecond plurality of DACs addressable by a respective one of the numberof row lines, wherein each of the DACs includes a respective pluralityof SQUIDS and a pair of current dividers, the current dividers eachcoupling a respective side of the SQUIDS of the respective DAC.

The array addressable superconducting flux DAC structure may furtherinclude a number of bit lines, wherein each of the plurality of SQUIDsthat is in the same relative position in each of the first and secondplurality of DACs is addressable by a respective one of the number ofbit lines.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING(S)

In the drawings, identical reference numbers identify similar elementsor acts. The sizes and relative positions of elements in the drawingsare not necessarily drawn to scale. For example, the shapes of variouselements and angles are not drawn to scale, and some of these elementsare arbitrarily enlarged and positioned to improve drawing legibility.Further, the particular shapes of the elements as drawn are not intendedto convey any information regarding the actual shape of the particularelements, and have been solely selected for ease of recognition in thedrawings.

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a superconducting inductor ladder thatimplements flux-divider circuits.

FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a superconducting inductor ladder intowhich N-bit digital signals are loaded by inductive coupling to N signallines.

FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a single flux quantum (SFQ) shiftregister.

FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a superconducting inductor ladder beingdirectly loaded by a SFQ shift register.

FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of a superconducting inductor ladder beingdirectly loaded by a flux-based superconducting shift registercomprising latching qubits.

FIG. 6A is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of a singlesuperconducting flux digital-to-analog converter (DAC) unit.

FIG. 6B is an approximate graph representing the gate and controlcurrents input into the superconducting flux DAC unit of FIG. 6A.

FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of a columnar weightedsuperconducting flux DAC that is made up of four individual unitsarranged in a column.

FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram of arrayal weighted superconducting fluxDAC that is made up of three columnar weighted superconducting fluxDACs, each including four individual units.

FIG. 9 is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of a system incorporatinga columnar weighted superconducting flux DAC to which flux signals areinitially administered by a SFQ shift register.

FIG. 10 is a schematic diagram of an embodiment in which latching qubitsare used to load flux data signals into a columnar weightedsuperconducting flux DAC.

FIG. 11 is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of a symmetricalcolumnar weighted superconducting flux DAC.

FIG. 12 is a schematic diagram of another embodiment of a symmetricalcolumnar weighted superconducting flux DAC.

FIG. 13 is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of a symmetricalcolumnar weighted superconducting flux DAC showing potential paths ofthe signal lines.

FIG. 14 is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of an arrayalarrangement of six symmetrical columnar weighted superconducting fluxDACs.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the following description, certain specific details are set forth inorder to provide a thorough understanding of various disclosedembodiments. However, one skilled in the relevant art will recognizethat embodiments may be practiced without one or more of these specificdetails, or with other methods, components, materials, etc. In otherinstances, well-known structures associated with quantum processors,such as quantum devices, coupling devices, and control systems includingmicroprocessors and drive circuitry have not been shown or described indetail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring descriptions of the embodiments.Throughout this specification and the appended claims, the words“element” and “elements” are used to encapsulate, but are not limitedto, all such structures, systems and devices associated with quantumprocessors, as well as their related programmable parameters.

Unless the context requires otherwise, throughout the specification andclaims which follow, the word “comprise” and variations thereof, suchas, “comprises” and “comprising” are to be construed in an open,inclusive sense, that is, as “including, but not limited to.”

Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment” or “anembodiment” means that a particular feature, structure or characteristicdescribed in connection with the embodiment is included in at least oneembodiment. Thus, the appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment” or“in an embodiment” in various places throughout this specification arenot necessarily all referring to the same embodiment. Furthermore, theparticular features, structures, or characteristics may be combined inany suitable manner in one or more embodiments.

As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singularforms “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural referents unless the contentclearly dictates otherwise. It should also be noted that the term “or”is generally employed in its sense including “and/or” unless the contentclearly dictates otherwise.

The headings and Abstract of the Disclosure provided herein are forconvenience only and do not interpret the scope or meaning of theembodiments.

Furthermore, certain figures herein depict various voltage and currentwaveforms. These waveforms are intended to be illustrative for purposesof understanding operation of embodiments, and are not intended to bedrawn to scale and/or to precisely and accurately depict waveformbehavior in terms of shape, amplitude, duty cycle, frequency,distortion, or other characteristics.

The present systems, methods and apparatus describe several embodimentsof superconducting flux-based digital-to-analog converters. While thesedevices are generally useful in any application in whichdigital-to-analog conversion in the superconducting regime is desired,these devices are particularly useful in the local programming of theelements of a superconducting processor, such as a superconductingquantum processor. Full descriptions of systems, methods and apparatusfor the local programming of the elements of a superconducting quantumprocessor are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/950,276.

In classical electrical circuits, a common way to achievedigital-to-analog conversion is through a circuit known as a “resistorladder” or “R-2R ladder.” Such circuits rely on the principles of the“voltage-divider” and are very well established in the art. However,they are not appropriate for use in the superconducting regime. Throughcertain modifications, as in for example U.S. Pat. No. 5,128,675, theresistor ladder can be made to operate in superconducting circuits.However, resistors in any form of circuit (be it classical orsuperconducting) inherently dissipate power by generating heat and thusthey produce thermal noise. This thermal noise can interfere with othercomponents in a highly sensitive superconducting system such as, forexample, a superconducting processor employing quantum devices, such asqubits. A modified resistor ladder is not appropriate for the localprogramming of superconducting quantum processor elements. Thus, thereis a need for a new circuit to achieve digital-to-analog conversion inthe superconducting regime without relying on a network of noisyresistors. The various embodiments described herein provide new and/orimproved systems, methods and apparatus for achieving digital-to-analogconversion of superconducting signals. Common to each embodiment is theimplementation of a novel circuit defined herein as a “superconductinginductor ladder circuit” (or a “ladder”). The various embodimentsdescribed herein provide alternative systems, methods and apparatus foradministering digital signals to such a ladder and/or administeringanalog signals from such a ladder.

In most applications where digital-to-analog conversion is desired in asystem that implements superconducting circuits, it is practical toperform such conversions at room temperature in classical circuitsbefore sending the signals into the superconducting regime. In contrast,the present systems, methods and apparatus apply where digital-to-analogconversion is desired in the superconducting regime, typically because aform of control circuitry is operated in the superconducting regime. Aspreviously stated, managing a single qubit in a superconducting quantumprocessor requires control over a number of parameters. Conventionally,this requirement necessitated outside communication (that is,communication from outside of the processor architecture) withindividual qubits. However, as such processors incorporate more and morequbits, scaling this system of outside communication is impractical andit may be desirable to replace outside communication with local, or“on-chip” control where signals are processed and administered withinthe superconducting regime, as described in U.S. patent application Ser.No. 11/950,276. The present systems, methods and apparatus describesuperconducting circuits that may be implemented in achieving such localcontrol.

In accordance with the present systems, methods and apparatus, asuperconducting inductor ladder circuit (“ladder”) functions byreceiving a multi-bit digital signal, combining the individual bits ofthe multi-bit digital signal into an analog signal, and administeringthe analog signal to, for example, at least one programmable device. Theladder may receive and administer signals in the form of magnetic fluxquanta.

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a ladder 100 according to oneillustrated embodiment. As drawn, ladder 100 comprises foursuperconducting loops (indicated by broken line boxes) 101-104,connected in parallel. N-bit digital signals are loaded into ladder 100such that each of superconducting loops 101-104 receives a respectiveone of the N bits. For example, ladder 100 may receive a 4-bit digitalsignal, where superconducting loop 101 receives the most significant bit(MSB) and superconducting loop 104 receives the least significant bit(LSB). In a classical electrical circuit, such digital bits may berepresented by voltages. However, in a superconducting circuit, suchdigital bits may be represented by magnetic flux quanta. Thus, while aclassical resistor ladder may implement voltage-divider circuits, ladder100 implements a superconducting analogue in the form of flux-dividercircuits.

Ladder 100 may operate as an intermediate device that converts a datasignal from a signal source and administers the converted signal to atleast one programmable device. FIG. 1 shows a signal output 130 fromladder 100 on the left-hand side, though those of skill in the art willrecognize that this is an arbitrary placement intended for illustrativepurposes only. Furthermore, signal output 130 shown in FIG. 1 is throughinductive coupling. In other embodiments, the output of ladder 100 maybe directly (i.e., galvanically) connected to at least one programmabledevice, or coupled to at least one programmable device by capacitivecoupling. In still other embodiments, the output of ladder 100 may beinductively coupled to an intermediate coupling device which is capableof being activated or deactivated by a control line. In suchembodiments, inductive coupling between ladder 100 and a programmabledevice is realized when the intermediate coupling device is activated bythe control line. Also, while ladder 100 is shown in FIG. 1 with foursuperconducting loops 101-104, those of skill in the art will appreciatethat any number of parallel superconducting loops could be useddepending on the requirements of the specific system and the resolutionof the digital signal being administered. For example, the analogconversion of an 8-bit digital signal may be realized using a ladderwith eight superconducting loops connected in parallel.

Returning to the exemplary embodiment shown in FIG. 1, the individualbits of a 4-bit digital signal are each loaded into a respective one ofsuperconducting loops 101-104. However, because superconducting loops101-104 are connected in parallel, the individual bit signals areconsequently shared between adjacent superconducting loops. In thissignal-sharing, only a portion of the magnetic flux contained within agiven superconducting loop 101-104 is administered to an adjacentsuperconducting loop. For example, superconducting loop 101 may receiveone full magnetic flux quantum as a representation of a single digitalbit from a 4-bit digital signal. Superconducting loop 101 may alsoreceive portions of the magnetic flux quanta that are distributed tosuperconducting loops 102-104 from the other bits of the same 4-bitdigital signal. In this case, superconducting loop 101, the mostsignificant bit (MSB), offers the greatest contribution to the analogoutput 130 because it is immediately adjacent to the analog output 130.It follows that superconducting loop 104, the least significant bit(LSB), offers the smallest contribution because it is the farthest awayfrom superconducting loop 101. In this manner, the discrete magneticflux quanta that make up a 4-bit digital signal are combined into oneanalog signal in superconducting loop 101 of ladder 100, from whencethey are administered to, for example, a programmable device. Althoughsignal sharing occurs in both directions (that is, distributed amongadjacent superconducting loops both to the left and to the right in FIG.1), since ladder 100 is only coupled to a programmable device throughsuperconducting loop 101 on the left, leftward distributions are mostrelevant. Those of skill in the art will appreciate that ladder 100 maybe coupled to a plurality of programmable devices through a singleoutput point 130 or from different superconducting loops at differentpoints along the length of the entire ladder 100.

As shown in FIG. 1, each superconducting loop 101-104 in ladder 100contains a serially coupled or “longitudinal” superconducting inductorL_(L) (111-114) and a parallelly coupled or “transverse” superconductinginductor L_(T) (121-124). Those of skill in the art will appreciate thatan equivalent circuit may substitute any single inductor in ladder 100with a plurality of inductors connected in series or in parallel, andthus the terms L_(L) and L_(T) may be taken to represent the totalserial or longitudinal and parallel or transverse inductances,respectively. The degree of signal-sharing among superconducting loops101-104 is governed by the magnitudes of these inductances.Specifically, the ratios of the magnitudes of the various serial orlongitudinal superconducting inductors 111-114 and parallel ortransverse superconducting inductors 121-124 influence how a data signalis administered between the superconducting loops 101-104. Thisratio-based signal distribution may be achieved in a manner that issimilar in some respects to the well-understood administration ofnon-superconducting data signals throughout a classical resistor laddercircuit. The present systems, methods and apparatus describe how toapply these concepts in the superconducting regime.

In some embodiments, the magnitudes of the inductors in ladder 100 maybe selected to facilitate binary encoding. For example, withinsuperconducting loop 102, serial or longitudinal superconductinginductor 112 and parallel or transverse superconducting inductor 122 maybe selected such that the ratio of their magnitudes is

$\frac{L_{112}}{L_{122}} \approx {\frac{1}{2}.}$In some embodiments, this ratio is the same for each superconductingloop in the ladder 100. In such embodiments, it may be practical toimplement superconducting inductors such that all serial or longitudinalsuperconducting inductors (111-114) have the same value of inductanceL_(L), and all parallel or transverse superconducting inductors(121-124) have the same value of inductance L_(T), where L_(T)˜2L_(L).Such a selection may improve accuracy while simplifying the design andfabrication of the ladder 100 for applications where binary encoding isdesired.

A further aspect of the present systems, methods and apparatus is themanner in which magnetic flux signals are loaded into the ladder. InFIG. 1, the loading sites are indicated but the mechanism by which themagnetic flux signals are produced and administered to the circuit isnot shown. One method for loading a ladder is shown in FIG. 2. FIG. 2 isa schematic diagram of a ladder 200 that is loaded by inductive couplingto signal input lines 201-204. Each signal input line 201-204 may carrya respective signal embodying a single bit of information. While thisarrangement has the benefit of simplicity, at least one signal line isrequired per bit of information. This amounts to many signal lines whenadministering high resolution signals. Complications arising from theintroduction of many signal lines to the system may be avoided byinstead loading the ladder using a more sophisticated technique of datamanipulation, such as, for example, a superconducting shift register. Inaccordance with the present systems, methods and apparatus, alternativestructures and techniques for loading superconducting signals into aladder circuit are described.

In some embodiments, communication with a ladder may be achieved byincorporating a superconducting memory register that operates onmagnetic flux quanta. A single flux quantum (SFQ) shift register is onesuch memory register that is well known in the art. FIG. 3 is aschematic diagram of an example SFQ shift register 300. The SFQ shiftregister 300 is essentially a Josephson transmission line (asuperconducting device that is well known in the art) where thepropagation of flux along the line is controlled rather than beingpermitted to flow freely. SFQ shift register 300 comprises fourindividual superconducting registers 301-304, although any number ofindividual superconducting registers is possible depending on the systemrequirements. By controlled application of the data and clock signals, adigital signal is formed in an individual superconducting register andthen made to shift along the line sequentially from individualsuperconducting register to adjacent individual superconductingregister. In SFQ shift register 300, the digital signal is representedby discrete magnetic flux quanta. Thus, SFQ shift register 300 may beused to generate a 4-bit binary signal, where each individualsuperconducting register represents a bit of information. However, inembodiments that permit the realization of multiple magnetic flux quantawithin each individual superconducting register, greater signalresolutions may be achieved with fewer individual superconductingregisters. A key characteristic of the SFQ shift register is that oneset of data and clock signal lines can be used to administer any N-bitsignal, and effectively any number of N-bit signals. This may greatlyreduce the number of communication conduits required in programming theelements of a superconducting processor and thus enhance the scalabilityof the system.

SFQ shift register 300 may be used to load signals into a ladder byeffectively replacing the inductive coupling to signal input lines201-204 shown in FIG. 2. FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a ladder 410being directly loaded by an SFQ shift register 300. In this embodiment,each of the longitudinal inductors 411-414 in ladder 410 are inductivelycoupled to a respective superconducting register in SFQ shift register300. As SFQ shift register 300 is controlled by only two signal lines(the clock and data lines, as shown in FIG. 4), the number of signallines required to load a 4-bit signal, or a signal of any resolution,into ladder 410 is only two. Thus, by loading a ladder with asuperconducting shift register, the number of external signal lines maybe minimized.

As discussed previously, the SFQ shift register may be used toadminister flux signals to any spatial layout of a ladder. Furthermore,certain embodiments may program any number of programmable devices byincorporating any number of ladders and SFQ shift registers in whateverspatial arrangement is required to adapt to the spatial constraints ofthe system and to accommodate the desired number of communicationconduits communicating with the external environment. For instance,certain embodiments may incorporate one continuous ladder communicatingwith one continuous SFQ shift register, where the layout of both devicesbends back and forth on itself (for example, similar to a serpentine or“S” pattern or crenulated shape) in order to fit onto a single chip andminimize the number of communication conduits. Such a layout could beused to communicate with any number of programmable devices by inductivecoupling, either directly or through an intermediate coupling device, atvarious points along the continuous layout. Similarly, either the ladderor the SFQ shift register, or both devices, may be incorporated asdistinct segments with little or no communication between each segment,where each segment communicates with either one distinct programmabledevice or a plurality of programmable devices.

In some embodiments, a flux-based superconducting shift registercomprised of latching qubits may be used to substitute for the SFQ shiftregister in some embodiments. Full descriptions of the operation oflatching qubits are provided in U.S. patent application Ser. No.12/109,847. Latching qubits may be used to load digital signals into anyform of ladder, including the previously described embodiments of theladder shown in FIGS. 1, 2 and 4. FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of aladder 510 being directly loaded by a flux-based superconducting shiftregister 520 comprised of latching qubits. In this embodiment, theoperation of ladder 510 is as described in for ladder 200 of FIG. 2,except in relation to the mechanism by which the flux data signals areadministered to the individual superconducting loops of ladder 510.

The superconducting inductor ladder circuit is a relatively simplecircuit that enables a novel mechanism for performing digital-to-analogconversion in the superconducting regime. It may be applied in anysystem that incorporates superconducting signals where it is desiredthat the superconducting signals be converted from digital to analogform. The various embodiments described in FIGS. 1, 2, 4 and 5 each useinductive coupling to load the individual bits of an N-bit data signalthrough the longitudinal superconducting inductors (i.e. inductors111-114) and into the ladder. However, in certain applications ofsuperconducting digital-to-analog conversion, it may be desired to loadthe individual bits of an N-bit digital signal into the ladder using analternative to inductive coupling. This is because inductive couplingmay be less than 100% efficient and therefore may inherently result insome signal loss. In some applications, this signal loss may beacceptable. However, in other applications, such as high-precisionaspects of superconducting quantum processors, this signal loss maypresent complications in the calibration and operation ofdigital-to-analog conversion. The present systems, methods, andapparatus therefore describe a scalable superconducting fluxdigital-to-analog converter (“DAC”) that may be loaded in a variety ofdifferent ways that do not result in such signal loss. This isaccomplished by generating (or, in certain embodiments, regenerating)the magnetic flux quantum representations of digital signals within thestructure of the DAC itself, thereby ensuring that each signal isrepresented by a whole magnetic flux quantum rather than a partialquantum due to losses. The various embodiments of this scalablesuperconducting flux DAC implement a ladder circuit similar to thatdescribed in FIGS. 1 and 2.

In some embodiments, flux data signals may be established within a DACitself. This may be achieved by, for example, the simultaneousapplication of at least two controllable electrical currents. These fluxdata signals are inherently digital as they are represented by thediscrete quantization of magnetic flux. In such embodiments, the digitalsignals established within the DAC are converted into analogsupercurrents and administered to, for example, at least oneprogrammable device.

A DAC may include a plurality of structural “units”, where the number ofunits is related to the number of bits of resolution in the digitalsignal to be converted. FIG. 6A shows a schematic diagram of anembodiment of a single superconducting flux DAC unit 651. In thisembodiment, DAC unit 651 is a superconducting device and includes asuperconductive quantum interference device (SQUID) 671. SQUID 671 isoperated by combining inputs from two controllable electrical currents:the gate current and control current. The gate current may be directlyconnected to SQUID 671 and the control current may be inductivelycoupled to SQUID 671 by inductor 661. In FIG. 6A, SQUID 671 is shownwith two Josephson junctions, 691 a and 692 a. However, those of skillin the art will appreciate that a SQUID having a different number orconfiguration of Josephson junctions may be substituted into DAC unit651. Superconducting loop 681 is connected in parallel across Josephsonjunction 691 a, and superconducting loop 681 includes a superconductinginductor 682. While superconducting inductor 682 is shown in FIG. 6A asa single device, those of skill in the art will appreciate thatsuperconducting inductor 682 may alternatively comprise a plurality ofinductor devices connected in series or in parallel.

Throughout this specification, the terms “forward direction” and“reverse direction” are used to describe the flow of electrical currentthrough certain devices. These terms convey no significance other thanto assist in describing the operation of electrical devices. The term“forward direction” is defined as being in the same direction as theindicating arrows in the associated Figure(s), while the term “reversedirection” is defined as being in the opposite direction in theassociated Figure(s).

In FIG. 6A, when both the gate current and the control current areapplied in the forward direction, the total current flowing throughJosephson junction 691 a is the sum of the contributions of the gate andcontrol currents, and the total current flowing through Josephsonjunction 692 a is the difference between the contributions of the gateand control currents. Thus, when both the gate current and the controlcurrent are applied in the forward direction, the total current flowingthrough Josephson junction 691 a can be made to approach the criticalcurrent for that junction. When the critical current is reached, amagnetic flux quantum is realized. At least a portion of this magneticflux is administered to superconducting loop 681 and stored insuperconducting inductor 682. In certain embodiments, at least a portionof the flux stored in superconducting inductor 682 is then administeredin the form of an analog supercurrent to, for example, a programmabledevice 622. In other embodiments, at least a portion of the flux storedin superconducting inductor 682 is administered to an intermediatedevice 642 through inductive coupling. In such embodiments, at least aportion of the flux stored in superconducting inductor 682 mayultimately be administered to, for example, a programmable device 622through intermediate device 642.

In some embodiments, the applied control current may be modulated asdepicted in FIG. 6B. FIG. 6B is an approximate graph representing thegate and control currents input into the DAC unit 651 of FIG. 6A.Furthermore, the SQUID inductance may be sufficiently high such that itis capable of realizing multiple magnetic flux quanta. Thus, when boththe gate current and the control current are applied in the forwarddirection, the total current flowing through Josephson junction 691 acan be made to approach the critical current of the junction at eachpeak in the modulated control current. In this manner, a discretemagnetic flux quantum may be realized each time the control currentcrosses the dashed threshold-line 691 b corresponding to junction 691 ain FIG. 6B. These multiple flux quanta may be administered tosuperconducting loop 681, where they are combined and stored insuperconducting inductor 682. In certain embodiments, at least a portionof the flux stored in superconducting inductor 682 is then administeredto, for example, a programmable device 622 in the form of an analogsupercurrent. In other embodiments, at least a portion of the fluxstored in superconducting inductor 682 is administered to anintermediate device 642 through inductive coupling. In such embodiments,at least a portion of the flux stored in superconducting inductor 682may ultimately be administered to, for example, a programmable device622 through intermediate device 642.

Throughout this specification, certain embodiments are described inwhich intermediate devices (such as intermediate device 642 in FIG. 6A)are included, and other embodiments are described in which suchintermediate devices are not included. Intermediate coupling can beadvantageous in systems, such as quantum processors composed ofsuperconducting flux qubits, which are particularly sensitive tomagnetic fields in their environment. Though not always necessary, theintermediate coupling device is a means of isolating the quantumprocessor from these magnetic fields during particular stages in itsoperation.

As previously described, DAC unit 651 may be capable of realizingmultiple magnetic flux quanta. Specifically, the number of magnetic fluxquanta n that may be realized by the unit 651 is dependent on theproperties of SQUID 671. The characteristics that affect the number ofmagnetic flux quanta n that may be realized by SQUID 671 are outlined inequation 1 below:

$\begin{matrix}{n = \frac{{LI}_{c}}{\Phi_{o}}} & (1)\end{matrix}$Where

-   -   L is the total SQUID inductance;    -   I_(c) is the critical current of the Josephson junction; and    -   φ₀ is a fundamental constant known as the magnetic flux quantum.

In theory, DAC unit 651 may be designed to realize any number ofmagnetic flux quanta n by adjusting the inductance L and the criticalcurrent I_(c) of the system. The number of magnetic flux quanta n thatcan be administered by the system directly determines the resolution ofany digital signal that the DAC unit 651 is capable of administering. AnN-bit signal requires 2^(N) units of information, or in this case,(2^(N)−1) magnetic flux quanta (since “0 flux quanta” is a unit ofinformation). Therefore for DAC unit 651 of FIG. 6A (which comprisesonly one SQUID), the maximum digital signal resolution is given by2^(N)=(n+1).

In practice, however, implementing DAC unit 651 into a physical systemintroduces restrictions on the inductance L and critical current I_(c).As such, DAC unit 651 has a maximum signal resolution capacity whenincorporated into a physical system. Thus, in order to administersignals of higher resolution, a plurality of DAC units may be combinedinto one DAC structure to administer more individual magnetic fluxquanta than physically realizable by a single DAC unit on its own. Insuch embodiments, the magnetic flux quanta administered by a set of DACunits may be combined into one analog supercurrent, where thecontributions from each specific DAC unit may be weighted or scaled bysome factor. Throughout this specification, embodiments ofsuperconducting flux DACs which incorporate multiple DAC units arereferred to as “weighted DACs.”

FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of a columnar weightedDAC 700 that is made up of four individual DAC units 701-704, arrangedin a column. While four individual DAC units are shown for illustration,any number of DAC units may be similarly assembled together, where thenumber of DAC units in a columnar weighted DAC is related to theresolution of the data signals being administered. For clarity, acolumnar layout is used in FIG. 7, however the present systems, methodsand apparatus are not so limited in their layout and references to a“column”, “columns”, or “columnar arrangement” of devices, and similarlyreferences to a “row”, “rows”, “array”, or an “arrayal arrangement” ofdevices, in this specification and the appended claims do notnecessarily limit the layout of the device to such a linear form. Thoseof skill in the art will appreciate that circuit layouts may be adaptedto accommodate any spatial design.

Columnar weighted DAC 700 provides systems, methods and apparatus forloading digital signals into a ladder circuit, similar to ladder 100 ofFIG. 1. The ladder circuit of columnar weighted DAC 700 is outlined bydashed lines and called out as 731 in FIG. 7. Similar to ladder 100 ofFIG. 1, ladder 731 includes four superconducting loops 711-714 connectedin parallel and a set of transverse inductors 721-724, where at leastone transverse inductor is shared between adjacent pairs ofsuperconducting loops. For example, inductor 722 is shared betweensuperconducting loops 711 and 712. Ladder 731 differs from ladder 100 inthat ladder 731 does not include longitudinal inductors (such aslongitudinal inductors 111-114 from ladder 100). This is because ladder731 receives magnetic flux quanta by direct, galvanic connections to aset of SQUIDs rather than by inductive coupling as in ladder 100.

In columnar weighted DAC 700, flux quanta are established within theDACs themselves. Individual DAC units 701-704 are connected in series bya single gate current input line. Each DAC unit 701-704 has its owninductively-coupled control current input line (C1-C4, respectively) andrealizes magnetic flux quanta according to Equation 1. However, in thecolumnar layout shown in FIG. 7, magnetic flux is also shared betweenDAC units 701-704 in ladder 731. Each DAC unit 701-704 in columnarweighted DAC 700 functions the same way as DAC unit 651 of FIG. 6A,except for the final distribution of magnetic flux. In the columnararrangement, flux that enters ladder 731 is sequentially distributedbetween superconducting inductors 721-724. The distribution between anytwo adjacent superconducting inductors is determined by the ratio of themagnitudes of their inductances k_(x) where the subscript x indicateswhich superconducting inductors are being compared. Thus, if n magneticflux quanta are realized by DAC unit 701 and distributed tosuperconducting inductor 721, then roughly nk_(721,722) magnetic fluxquanta will be administered to superconducting inductor 722,nk_(721,722)k_(722,723) magnetic flux quanta will be administered tosuperconducting inductor 723, and nk_(721,722)k_(722,723)k_(723,724)magnetic flux quanta will be administered to superconducting inductor724. Thus, the total flux that each DAC unit 701-704 contributes to thelast superconducting inductor (in this case superconducting inductor725) is uniquely weighted by the k_(x) scaling factor(s). In this way, ahigh resolution digital signal represented by many discrete magneticflux quanta may be compressed into fractions of quanta, wheresuperconducting loop 714 ultimately contains a flux that isrepresentative of the full resolution signal. This final signal ispresent in superconducting loop 714 as an analog supercurrent with amagnitude that is weighted by the sequential distribution of discretemagnetic flux quanta through superconducting inductors 721-724. Incertain embodiments, the analog supercurrent is coupled to anintermediate device 741 by superconducting inductor 725, from which thesignal is transmitted to, for example, a programmable device (notshown). In other embodiments, intermediate device 741 is not requiredand the analog supercurrent is coupled directly from superconductinginductor 725 to, for example, a programmable device.

In some embodiments of columnar weighted DAC 700, each of individual DACunits 701-704 may be designed to administer a single magnetic fluxquantum per cycle. In such cases, magnetic flux quanta can be used torepresent any N-bit binary signal by implementing N=log₂ n individualDAC units in columnar weighted DAC 700. With only one magnetic fluxquantum being realized by each SQUID, inductances can be kept quite low,however higher resolution signals demand more and more elaborate layoutsconsisting of a greater number of individual DAC units.

In other embodiments of the present systems, methods and apparatus, DACunits 701-704 are each used to administer multiple flux quanta percycle. The exact number of flux quanta that can be realized by eachindividual DAC unit is still limited by Equation 1, but having n>1 ineach DAC unit 701-704 increases the maximum manageable signal resolutionwithout requiring a large number of DAC units in columnar weighted DAC700. However, inherent to this embodiment is the notion of doublecounting, whereby magnetic flux quanta realized in two different DACunits can ultimately administer the same weighted quantity of flux tosuperconducting inductor 725 at the end of ladder 731. That is, incertain embodiments, a given analog supercurrent output from thecolumnar weighted DAC 700 may be produced by a variety of distinct inputsignal combinations. This effectively lowers the signal resolutionbecause certain distinct input combinations will produce the sameoutput. Thus, the effective resolution is given by:

$\begin{matrix}{N = {( {\frac{{LI}_{c}}{\Phi_{o}} + 1} )^{\alpha} - ({DoubleCounts})}} & (2)\end{matrix}$

Where α is the number of individual DAC units in the column (assumingeach individual DAC unit 701-704 is designed to administer the samenumber of magnetic flux quanta). In situations where the signalresolution, after including the effects of double counting, is more thansufficient to produce all unique output signals that are required tofully program the system, then the presence of double counting can beadvantageous. In such systems, double counting provides some versatilityin programming input signals and allows for some imprecision in thek_(x) scaling factors, both while maintaining full-range leastsignificant bit values. Furthermore, using distinct input signalcombinations to produce the same output signal can be helpful incalibrating the system.

Certain systems may require a greater number of distinct output signalswhich cannot be attained while double counting effects are present. Theeffect of double counting could be eliminated if there were no limits onL and I_(c) in the individual DAC units. However, because these limitsdo exist in physical systems, double counting effects will always reducethe maximum manageable resolution of the columnar weighted DAC.

In further embodiments of the present systems, methods and apparatus,the ratios k_(x) of the magnitudes of the inductances of adjacentsuperconducting inductors in ladder 731 are selected such that no twoindividual DAC units in columnar weighted DAC 700 ultimately administerthe same weighted quantity of flux to superconducting inductor 725 atthe end of ladder 731. In such cases, the effects of double counting maybe mitigated and a higher effective signal resolution may be obtained,given the limits imposed on each unit inductance L and critical currentI_(c). In one such embodiment, the k_(x) scaling factors are selectedsuch that less than one full magnetic flux quantum is administeredbetween adjacent transverse or parallel superconducting inductors forany number of input magnetic flux quanta. In other words, k_(x) may beselected such that:

$\begin{matrix}{k_{x} < \frac{\Phi_{o}}{{LI}_{c}}} & (3)\end{matrix}$

By incorporating individual DAC units that are used to realize multiplemagnetic flux quanta, the number X of such DACs required to administeran N-bit signal may be reduced from X=log₂N to X=log_((n+1))N where n isthe number of flux quanta that can be administered by each individualDAC unit.

In certain embodiments, a superconducting quantum processor may includea plurality of programmable devices, such as but not limited tosuperconducting flux qubits and tunable couplers. In such embodiments, aplurality of distinct data signals may be administered to the quantumprocessor in order to individually control the various programmabledevices. As stated previously, FIG. 7 shows columnar weighted DAC 700 asbeing composed of four individual DAC units 701-704, but any number ofsuch individual DAC units may be used as required by the system. Thus,in some embodiments of the present systems, methods and apparatus asingle columnar weighted DAC such as columnar weighted DAC 700 may beused to program a plurality of programmable devices. One such embodimentinvolves inductively coupling, in at least one instance and eitherdirectly or through an intermediate coupling device such as intermediatecoupling device 642, programmable devices to superconducting inductorsin ladder 731. Another such embodiment involves breaking ladder 731 intomultiple ladders where each ladder administers a data signal to at leastone programmable device via inductive coupling, either directly orthrough an intermediate coupling device such as intermediate couplingdevice 642.

In some embodiments, a plurality of superconducting flux DACs, such ascolumnar weighted DAC 700, may be coupled to a single programmabledevice. For example, multiple columnar weighted DACs 700 may be coupledto a single superconducting flux qubit, or a single tunable qubitcoupler. Having multiple DACs coupled to a single programmable devicemay allow analog signals to be applied in a substantially continuouswaveform, which may be advantageous in certain applications.

In further embodiments of the present systems, methods and apparatus, aweighted arrayal arrangement of individual DAC units may be used toadminister data signals to, for example, a plurality of programmabledevices. FIG. 8 shows a schematic diagram of arrayal weighted DAC 800that is made up of three columnar weighted DACs 801-803, each includingfour individual DAC units (to reduce clutter, the DAC units are notcalled out in FIG. 8, but each is substantially similar in structure toDAC unit 651 from FIG. 6A). The number of columns, rows, and individualunits shown in FIG. 8 represents one possible arrangement of an arrayalweighted DAC, while this specification and the appended claims encompassany number of columns, rows and individual units. Each column in FIG. 8functions in much the same way as columnar weighted DAC 700 shown inFIG. 7, except that the control current input lines are connected inseries across each row in the arrayal weighted DAC 800. Therefore, eachindividual DAC unit in arrayal weighted DAC 800 is addressable accordingto its X-Y coordinates in arrayal weighted DAC 800. In arrayal weightedDAC 800, flux quanta are established within the individual DAC unitsthemselves according to deliberate simultaneous application of the gateand control currents that intersect at specific X-Y coordinates Forexample, magnetic flux quanta may be specifically realized in only SQUID871 (slightly shaded in FIG. 8 for easier identification) of arrayalweighted DAC 800 by activating gate current G2 in the forward directionand simultaneously applying control current C2 in the forward direction.This realized flux may then be administered through the laddercorresponding to column 802 in arrayal weighted DAC 800, where it isconverted into an analog supercurrent according to the k_(x) scalingfactor(s) of successive superconducting inductors as in columnarweighted DAC 700 shown in FIG. 7. The final analog supercurrent is thenadministered to, for example, a programmable device 841 via inductivecoupling, either directly or through an intermediate coupling devicesuch as intermediate coupling device 642.

FIG. 8 is an embodiment of a superconducting flux DAC that uses anarrayal arrangement of twelve individual DAC units laid out in four rowsand three columns to administer data signals to, for example, threeprogrammable devices. In some embodiments, there may be more than threeprogrammable devices in the system. In such embodiments, weightedarrayal arrangements of any number of columns, rows, and individualunits may be used as required by the system. Furthermore, while FIG. 8shows a relationship of one column per programmable device, otherembodiments may incorporate multiple programmable devices coupled,either directly or through intermediate coupling devices such asintermediate coupling device 642, to various points on a single columnin arrayal weighted DAC 800. Such embodiments may be used to minimizethe number of communication conduits required to operate the system andthus are advantageous when scalability is an issue. Similarly, incertain applications it may be necessary to couple more than one columnto a single programmable device.

For clarity, a linear arrayal layout is used in FIG. 8, however aspreviously noted the present systems, methods and apparatus are not solimited in layout and references to an “array” or “arrayal arrangement”of devices, and similarly references to a “column”, “columns”, or“columnar arrangement” and similarly references to a “row” or “rows” ofdevices, in this specification and the appended claims do notnecessarily limit the layout of the device to such a linear form. Thoseof skill in the art will appreciate that circuit layouts may be adaptedto accommodate any spatial design and a superconducting flux DAC can beoperated with any number of columns, rows, and individual units asrequired by the system. Furthermore, some embodiments may include aplurality of independent or electrically isolated columns, rows, orarrays where it is not necessary for each column, row, and array toincorporate the same number of individual DAC units.

As previously discussed, some embodiments of superconducting flux DACsmay use memory registers to load data signals into the system, ratherthan having the flux initially realized by the DAC units themselves. Inorder to communicate with a superconducting flux DAC, a superconductingmemory register that administers magnetic flux quanta is desired. Asingle flux quantum (SFQ) shift register, such as SFQ shift register 300shown in FIG. 3, is one such memory register that is well known in theart. Thus, some embodiments of the present systems, methods andapparatus incorporate SFQ shift registers into a superconducting fluxDAC for the purposes of realizing and administering the originalmagnetic flux signals. Those of skill in the art, however, willappreciate that other devices may be used for these purposes, such aslatching qubits as disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No.12/109,847.

A memory register may be used in conjunction with a superconducting fluxDAC by effectively replacing the control current input line(s), such ascontrol current input lines C1-C4 in FIG. 7 and FIG. 8. Thus, in someembodiments, a memory register may be used to administer flux signals toan individual DAC unit such as DAC unit 651. In other embodiments, amemory register may be used to administer flux signals to a columnarweighted DAC such as columnar weighted DAC 700. In still otherembodiments, a memory register may be used to administer flux signals toan arrayal weighted DAC such as arrayal weighted DAC 800.

FIG. 9 is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of a system 900incorporating a columnar weighted DAC 700 to which flux signals areinitially administered by a SFQ shift register 300. In order to improvelegibility, not all components of FIG. 9 are labeled. FIG. 9 showscolumnar weighted DAC 700 rotated clockwise by 90° and inductivelycoupled to SFQ shift register 300 at four locations (901-904). Controlcurrent input lines C1-C4 from FIG. 7 are not required in the embodimentshown in FIG. 9, because in this embodiment the flux signals may beinitially realized within SFQ shift register 300 rather than within theindividual DAC units themselves.

In the embodiment shown in FIG. 9, the SQUIDs of columnar weighted DAC700 have a slightly different spatial layout than in the embodimentsshown in the other Figures. For example, SQUID 971 shown in FIG. 9 has aspatial layout that is different from SQUIDs 871 and 671 shown in FIGS.8 and 6A, respectively. However, electrically the SQUID layouts shown inall Figures are equivalent. Those of skill in the art will appreciatethat electrical circuit layouts may come in a great variety of spatialforms yet still operate in the same way electrically. The alternativeSQUID layout that is shown in FIG. 9 is designed to facilitatecommunication between columnar weighted DAC 700 and SFQ shift register300. This communication is realized through inductive coupling attransformers 901-904 (slightly shaded in FIG. 9 for easieridentification). Although flux signals are initially realized in the SFQshift register, SQUIDs (such as SQUID 971) are still used in columnarweighted DAC 700 because, as previously described, the inductivetransfer of flux in transformers 901-904 may not be efficient. Thus, inthe embodiment shown in FIG. 9, flux signals are initially establishedin SFQ shift register 300, but these signals are used to regeneratewhole flux quanta in the SQUIDs (such as SQUID 971) in columnar weightedDAC 700. By this process, whole flux quanta (rather than partial quantadue to transfer losses) are administered, thereby ensuring consistencyin the calibration of the analog supercurrents produced by the columnarweighted DAC. In this embodiment, an N-bit signal may be completelyloaded into SFQ shift register 300 while the gate current G1 of columnarweighted DAC 700 is deactivated. Once gate current G1 is activated inthe forward direction, the flux signals stored in each individualsuperconducting register of SFQ shift register 300 are regenerated inthe corresponding individual DAC units of columnar weighted DAC 700. Theflux signals are then administered to the respective superconductingloops (such as superconducting loops 711-714 in FIG. 7) where theycombine in the ladder (such as ladder 731 in FIG. 7) according to theirk scaling factors as determined by the relative magnitudes of thesuperconducting inductors 721-724. This combination produces an analogsupercurrent which is then administered to, for example, a programmabledevice 741 by inductive coupling, either directly of through anintermediate coupling device such as intermediate coupling device 642.

As discussed previously, the SFQ shift register may be used toadminister flux signals to any spatial layout of a superconducting fluxDAC. Furthermore, certain embodiments may program any number ofprogrammable devices by incorporating any number of superconducting fluxDACs and SFQ shift registers in whatever spatial arrangement is requiredto adapt to the spatial constraints of the system and to accommodate thedesired number of communication conduits communicating with the externalenvironment. For instance, certain embodiments may incorporate onecontinuous columnar weighted DAC communicating with one continuous SFQshift register, where the layout of both devices bends back and forth onitself (for example, similar to a serpentine or “S” pattern orcrenulated shape) in order to fit onto a single chip and minimize thenumber of communication conduits. Such a layout could be used tocommunicate with any number of programmable devices by, for example,inductive coupling, either directly or through intermediate couplingdevices such as intermediate coupling device 642, at various pointsalong the continuous layout. Similarly, either the superconducting fluxDAC or the SFQ shift register, or both devices, may be incorporated asdistinct segments with little or no communication between each segment,where each segment communicates with either one distinct programmabledevice or a plurality of programmable devices.

As previously discussed, latching qubits may be used to substitute theSFQ shift register in some embodiments. Latching qubits may be used toload digital signals into any form of superconducting flux DAC. FIG. 10shows a schematic diagram of an embodiment in which latching qubits(collectively 1001) are used to load flux data signals into a columnarweighted DAC 1002. In this embodiment, the operation of the columnarweighted DAC 1002 is substantially similar to that described fromcolumnar weighted DAC 700 in FIG. 9, except in relation to the mechanismby which the flux data signals are administered to columnar weighted DAC1002. Latching qubits 1001 may be implemented as a flux-basedsuperconducting shift register as described in U.S. Provisional Patentapplication Ser. No. 60/913,980, filed Apr. 25, 2007 and entitled“ADIABATIC SUPERCONDUCTING QUBIT LOGIC DEVICES AND METHODS” and U.S.patent application Ser. No. 12/109,847.

The embodiments of superconducting flux DACs shown in FIGS. 6-10 maysatisfy the requirements of many applications. However, certaincharacteristics of these DACs may be undesirable in some applications.For instance, in columnar weighted DAC 700, ladder 731 is galvanicallycoupled to only one side of each respective SQUID in DAC units 701-704.DAC 700 is therefore asymmetrical and, as a consequence, controlcurrents C1-C4 may become highly visible in the analog supercurrent thatis output from superconducting inductor 725. Furthermore, because ladder731 is galvanically coupled to each respective SQUID in DAC units701-704, the gate current line that connects DAC units 701-704 in serieswith one another may be affected by the inductances in ladder 731. As aconsequence, each of DAC units 701-704 may receive a slightly differentgate current signal. This may put each respective SQUID in each of DACunits 701-704 into a different working point and may make it difficultto scale the output analog supercurrent with the input control signals.Thus, while the embodiments of superconducting flux DACs of FIGS. 6-10may satisfy the requirements of many applications, they can exhibitcertain characteristics that may be undesirable in sensitiveapplications. The present systems, methods and apparatus describeadditional embodiments of superconducting flux DACs that may beadvantageous in applications that are sensitive to such characteristics.

FIG. 11 is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of a symmetricalcolumnar weighted DAC 1100. DAC 1100 functions in a similar way to DAC700 from FIG. 7, except that DAC 1100 includes two ladders 1131 and 1132that capture magnetic flux signals from both sides of SQUIDs 1151-1153.Note that DAC 1100 is illustrated as a column of three seriallyconnected SQUIDs 1151-1153, however any number of SQUIDs may be useddepending on the resolution of the digital signals being converted bythe DAC. For example, DAC 1100 may convert 3-bit digital signals intoanalog signals. The second ladder (1132) in DAC 1100 allows DAC 1100 toproduce twice the output of DAC 700. Whenever a magnetic flux quantum isadministered from a SQUID to a superconducting loop in ladder 1131, asecond magnetic flux quantum of opposite sign may be administered fromthe same SQUID to a superconducting loop in ladder 1132. For example,simultaneous application of the gate current I_(column) and the controlcurrent I_(bit1) may be used to produce magnetic flux quanta in SQUID1151. In this case, a flux quantum of one sign may be output on theright side of SQUID 1151 and captured in ladder 1131 and a flux quantumof opposite sign may be output on the left side of SQUID 1151 andcaptured in ladder 1132. Both ladders 1131 and 1132 are inductivelycoupled to a gradiometric transformer 1140 where the magnitudes of thesignals output by both ladders 1131 and 1132 are combined to producedouble the output signal compared to DAC 700. Furthermore, the controlcurrents that couple into both ladders 1131 and 1132 may be of the samesign, so that when they combine in gradiometric transformer 1140 theyare subtracted and cancel each other out. Thus, the control currentsignals may be less visible in DAC 1100 than in DAC 700. The symmetricaldesign of DAC 1100 improves its resistance against external magneticnoise sources and helps to localize its own magnetic field, therebyproducing less noise to impact any sensitive surrounding circuitry.

Throughout this specification, certain embodiments of the presentsystems, methods and apparatus are described as being “symmetrical.”Those of skill in the art will appreciate that the layout of an electriccircuit may be adapted to accommodate the spatial constraints of anysystem in which it is being implemented. Thus, the term “symmetrical” isused loosely herein to indicate a circuit within which similaroperations are performed in similar relative positions on either side ofat least one component.

DAC 1100 may be more appropriate than DAC 700 in applications that aresensitive to the effects of the asymmetrical design of DAC 700. However,as previously discussed some applications may be sensitive to theeffects of the galvanic coupling between DAC units 701-704 and ladder731 in DAC 700. FIG. 12 is a schematic diagram of another embodiment ofa symmetrical columnar weighted DAC 1200. DAC 1200 functions in asimilar way to DAC 1100, except that flux signals are inductivelycoupled from SQUIDs 1251-1253 through transformers as opposed to beinggalvanically coupled. The incorporation of inductive transformers (notcalled out in the Figure to reduce clutter) may be advantageous in someapplications, because such inductive coupling allows the gate currentsignals I_(column) to pass through SQUIDs 1251-1253 without “seeing” theinductances in the superconducting loops of the adjacent ladders. In DAC1200, I_(column) acts as a true bias current that is substantially thesame for each of SQUIDs 1251-1253. Thus, each of SQUIDs 1251-1253 mayoperate at approximately the same working point, making it easier toscale the output analog supercurrent with the input control signals.

The present systems, methods and apparatus may also be operated inarrayal arrangements. DAC 1200 from FIG. 12 includes an additionalsignal line, I_(row) for inductively coupling control currents into eachof SQUIDs 1251-1253. The same I_(row) signal line may be coupled to eachof SQUIDs 1251-1253 respectively. FIG. 13 is a schematic diagram of anembodiment of a symmetrical columnar weighted DAC 1300 showing potentialpaths of the signal lines Bit1-Bit3 and Row1. DAC 1300 is similar to DAC1200 except that the signal lines I_(bit1)-I_(bit3) from DAC 1200 arerenamed Bit1-Bit3 in DAC 1300 and the signal line I_(row) from DAC 1200is renamed Row1 in DAC 1300. In addition, potential signal paths aremade more explicit in DAC 1300. For example, signal lines Bit1-Bit3 areextended by solid lines and the Row1 signal line is represented by adotted line. In a single columnar arrangement such as that illustratedin FIG. 11 and FIG. 12, the Row1 signal line may be omitted. A singlecolumnar arrangement is well-suited to converting an N-bit digitalsignal (where the signal resolution N may equal the number of SQUIDs inthe column) into an analog signal and coupling that analog signal to,for example, one or many programmable devices. In some embodiments itmay be desirable to couple signals to a large number of programmabledevices. In such embodiments, a plurality of symmetrical columnarweighted DACs may be operated in an arrayal arrangement where theinclusion of “row-based” signal lines such as I_(row) and Row1 may beadvantageous. Embodiments that include a row-based signal line such asI_(row) and Row1 may be adapted such that magnetic flux quanta may begenerated by a given SQUID when the Column, Bit, and Row signal linesthat are coupled to that SQUID are all applied simultaneously.

FIG. 14 is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of an arrayalarrangement 1400 of symmetrical columnar weighted DACs 1401-1406. Eachof DACs 1401-1406 may be substantially similar in structure and functionto DACs 1200 and 1300 from FIGS. 12 and 13, respectively. The purpose ofFIG. 14 is to illustrate the interconnections between the Bit, Row andColumn signal paths in arrayal arrangement 1400, and thus DACs 1401-1406themselves are represented by simplified boxes, where each box containsSQUID, ladder, and gradiometric transformer structures similar to thoseincluded in DACs 1200 and 1300. Arrayal arrangement 1400 includes sixDACs 1401-1406, however any number of such DACs may be operated in anarrayal arrangement depending on the requirements of the application. Insome embodiments, each DAC 1401-1406 is used to couple signals to asingle programmable device, or a small number of programmable devices.Thus, applications with many programmable devices may include additionalDACs in arrayal arrangement 1400.

Arrayal arrangement 1400 includes two rows and three columns, though anynumber of rows and columns may be implemented depending on therequirements of the specific application. In some embodiments, all DACsin a given column may be coupled to the same Column signal line. Forexample, DACs 1401 and 1404 are in the first column in arrayalarrangement 1400 and both DACs 1401 and 1404 are coupled to the Column1signal line. Similarly, all DACs in a given row may be coupled to thesame Row signal line. For example, DACs 1401-1403 are in the first rowin arrayal arrangement 1400 and thus DACs 1401-1403 are coupled to theRow1 signal line. The Row1 signal line is represented by a dotted linein FIG. 14 and it is shown to “zig-zag” through each column of DACs1401-1403. This zig-zag indicates that the Row1 signal line is coupledto each SQUID in each of DACs 1401-1403 as illustrated in DAC 1300 ofFIG. 13. Furthermore, in some embodiments all SQUIDs in the samerelative position in each of DACs 1401-1406 may be coupled to the sameBit signal line. For example, each of DACs 1401-1406 in arrayalarrangement 1400 includes three SQUIDs, and thus there are three Bitsignal lines in arrayal arrangement 1400. The Bit1 signal line iscoupled to the topmost SQUID in each of DACs 1401-1406, the Bit2 signalline is coupled to the middle SQUID in each of DACs 1401-1406, and theBit3 signal lines is coupled to the bottommost SQUID in each of DACs1401-1406.

The Bit, Row and Column signal line coupling scheme used in arrayalarrangement 1400 reduces the number of signal lines required to programDACs 1401-1406. According to this scheme, the number of signal linesrequired to program the DACs is N+R+C, where N is the number of bits ofresolution in the data signals and R and C are the number of rows andcolumns in the arrayal arrangement, respectively.

The present systems, methods and apparatus, including but not limited tothe embodiments of a scalable superconducting flux DAC described herein,may be operated “in reverse” by switching bias polarity and“subtracting” magnetic flux quanta from the superconducting loops. Suchoperation may be advantageous in some applications because it mayprovide a mechanism for unloading or resetting the superconducting fluxDAC devices.

The above description of illustrated embodiments, including what isdescribed in the Abstract, is not intended to be exhaustive or to limitthe embodiments to the precise forms disclosed. Although specificembodiments of and examples are described herein for illustrativepurposes, various equivalent modifications can be made without departingfrom the spirit and scope of the disclosure, as will be recognized bythose skilled in the relevant art. The teachings provided herein of thevarious embodiments can be applied to other superconducting systems, notnecessarily the exemplary superconducting quantum computing systemsgenerally described above.

The various embodiments described above can be combined to providefurther embodiments. All of the U.S. patents, U.S. patent applicationpublications, U.S. patent applications, foreign patents, foreign patentapplications and non-patent publications referred to in thisspecification and/or listed in the Application Data Sheet, including butnot limited to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/917,884,filed May 14, 2007, entitled “Scalable Superconducting FluxDigital-To-Analog Conversion Using A Superconducting Inductor LadderCircuit”, U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/917,891, filedMay 14, 2007, entitled “Systems, Methods, And Apparatus For A ScalableSuperconducting Flux Digital-To-Analog Converter”, U.S. ProvisionalPatent Application Ser. No. 60/975,487, filed Sep. 26, 2007, entitled“Systems, Methods and Apparatus for a Differential Superconducting FluxDigital-to-Analog Converter”, U.S. Pat. No. 6,838,694, U.S. Pat. No.7,335,909, US Patent Publication No. 2006-0225165, U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 12/013,192, U.S. Provisional Patent ApplicationSer. No. 60/986,554 filed Nov. 8, 2007 and entitled “Systems, Devicesand Methods for Analog Processing”, U.S. Provisional Patent ApplicationSer. No. 61/039,710, filed Mar. 26, 2008 and entitled “Systems, Devices,And Methods For Analog Processing”, US Patent Publication No.2006-0147154, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/017,995, U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 11/950,276, and U.S. patent application Ser. No.12/109,847 are incorporated herein by reference, in their entirety.Aspects of the embodiments can be modified, if necessary, to employsystems, circuits and concepts of the various patents, applications andpublications to provide yet further embodiments.

These and other changes can be made to the embodiments in light of theabove-detailed description. In general, in the following claims, theterms used should not be construed to limit the claims to the specificembodiments disclosed in the specification and the claims, but should beconstrued to include all possible embodiments along with the full scopeof equivalents to which such claims are entitled. Accordingly, theclaims are not limited by the disclosure.

The invention claimed is:
 1. A method of operation in a local controlsubsystem for programming the elements of a superconducting programmabledevice, the method comprising: for each element being programmed:encoding the programming of the respective element in at least onedigital signal; generating the at least one digital signal in the formof discrete magnetic flux quanta; administering the discrete magneticflux quanta to at least two storage devices; combining the discretemagnetic flux quanta into an analog signal, wherein the contribution ofeach magnetic flux quantum is weighted according to the storage deviceto which it was administered; and administering the analog signal to therespective element of the superconducting programmable device.
 2. Themethod of claim 1 wherein the superconducting programmable device is asuperconducting quantum processor.
 3. The method of claim 2 wherein atleast one element being programmed comprises a superconducting qubit. 4.The method of claim 1 wherein the analog signal is a supercurrent. 5.The method of claim 1 wherein generating the digital signal in the formof discrete magnetic flux quanta comprises generating discrete magneticflux quanta via at least one superconducting quantum interference device(SQUID).
 6. The method of claim 5 wherein generating the digital signalin the form of discrete magnetic flux quanta comprises generatingdiscrete magnetic flux quanta via at least two SQUIDs, and wherein eachSQUID is coupled to a respective storage device.
 7. The method of claim5 wherein generating the digital signal in the form of discrete magneticflux quanta comprises generating discrete magnetic flux quanta via anaddressable superconducting flux digital-to-analog converter (DAC)structure.
 8. The method of claim 7 wherein combining the discretemagnetic flux quanta into an analog signal includes combining thediscrete magnetic flux quanta via the addressable superconducting fluxDAC structure.
 9. The method of claim 1 wherein administering thediscrete magnetic flux quanta to at least two storage devices comprisesadministering the discrete magnetic flux quanta to at least two storagedevices via inductive coupling.
 10. The method of claim 1 wherein eachof the at least two storage devices comprises a respectivesuperconducting inductor.
 11. The method of claim 1 whereinadministering the analog signal to the element of the superconductingprogrammable device comprises administering the analog signal to theelement of the superconducting programmable device via inductivecoupling.
 12. The method of claim 1, further comprising: resetting thestorage devices by subtracting discrete magnetic flux quanta from thestorage devices.
 13. A superconducting programmable device comprising: aplurality of programmable elements; and an addressable superconductingflux digital-to-analog converter (DAC) structure, the addressablesuperconducting flux DAC structure comprising: a first plurality of DACsaddressable by a first column line, each of the DACs in the firstplurality of DACs addressable by a respective one of a number of bitlines; and at least a second plurality of DACs addressable by a secondcolumn line, each of the DACs in the second plurality of DACsaddressable by a respective one of the number of bit lines, wherein eachof the DACs includes at least one respective flux divider network and atleast two respective superconducting quantum interference devices(SQUIDs), each of the at least two SQUIDs configured to inductivelycouple magnetic flux quanta to a respective superconducting inductor inthe at least one flux divider network; wherein each DAC in theaddressable superconducting flux DAC structure is configured toadminister signals to at least one programmable element in the pluralityof programmable elements.
 14. The superconducting programmable device ofclaim 13 wherein the superconducting programmable device is asuperconducting processor.
 15. The superconducting programmable deviceof claim 14 wherein the superconducting programmable device is asuperconducting quantum processor.
 16. The superconducting programmabledevice of claim 15 wherein the plurality of programmable elementsincludes at least two superconducting qubits.
 17. The superconductingprogrammable device of claim 16 wherein the at least two superconductingqubits are superconducting flux qubits.
 18. The superconductingprogrammable device of claim 16 wherein the plurality of programmableelements includes at least one tunable qubit coupler.
 19. Thesuperconducting programmable device of claim 13 wherein the addressablesuperconducting flux DAC structure further comprises: a first row line,wherein a first one of the DACs in the first plurality of DACs isaddressable by the first row line and a first one of the DACs in thesecond plurality of DACs is addressable by the first row line; and asecond row line, wherein a second one of the DACs in the first pluralityof DACs is addressable by the second row line and a second one of theDACs in the second plurality of DACs is addressable by the second rowline.